Correct Answer - Option 2 : 2
Explanation:
CCDs have the highest light sensitivity of any light detection technique available, but they aren’t the best sensor for every application. Below is a table demonstrating some of the advantages of the more common detectors available.
- CCDs are capable of holding a large signal in any single pixel, and also have a very low read noise and dark current, thus they have a very large dynamic range.
- CMOS parts have more read noise, and generally smaller pixels than CCDs and thus don’t quite compare to CCDs.
- A photomultiplier tube (PMT) can generate an electric output after a photon strikes the photocathode in just a few nanoseconds - not even high speed CMOS devices can match this.
In a general sense, CCDs are much better where low noise is essential, but CMOS can be better in applications where speed is important and cooling is not needed
|
PMT
|
Film
|
CCD
|
CMOS
|
Dynamic Range
|
> 1000
|
< 100
|
> 10000
|
> 5000
|
Detection speed
|
fastest
|
Slow
|
Slow
|
Fast
|
Quantum Efficiency
|
5 – 20%
|
5 – 20%
|
25 – 95%
|
15 – 35%
|
Multi-channel
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Real time
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Spectral Sensitivity
|
300 – 900 nm
|
200 – 1300
|
300 – 1100
|
400 – 1100
|
Dark Signal
|
Good
|
Poor
|
Best
|
Best
|
Read noise
|
Good
|
Good
|
Best
|
Best
|
Conclusion:
From the table it is clear that CCD have lower dark current and read noise, high voltage operation since it is having the capability of holding large signal.
Extra points:
- CCDs turn up to 95% of incident photons into usable signal, which can be read with low noise electronics.
- CMOS devices can read an entire array of silicon very quickly, but at the expense of noise in comparison to CCDs.
- Film, CCDs and CMOS can make pictures with one input event, while a PMT is a single source (one pixel) detector.
- Film must be processed in order to see the image that was detected which can take some time – but CMOS, CCDs and PMTs can be actively monitored and recorded by computers or other display devices.