Correct Answer - Option 3 : Since waste can be managed tactfully, atomic energy is a better option to produce energy by avoiding aggravation of pollution and consumption of biofuels.
Option(3) is the answer.
Here we analyze options one by one.
(1) Energy produced using bio-fuels contributes towards pollution of various types: We can't inference this statement as there is no indication about various types of pollution.
(2) Atomic energy is the better option as it doesn’t require bio-fuels: We can't inference this statement as there is no purpose is indicated in this statement may be atomic energy is not a better option than bio-fuels in a few aspects.
(3) Since waste can be managed tactfully, atomic energy is a better option to produce energy by avoiding the aggravation of pollution and consumption of biofuels: We can inference this statement as it is specific and related to the context given.
(4) There is no better way other than producing atomic energy in large quantities for managing the scarcity of fossil fuels and shortage of energy: We can't inference this statement as there is no indication of scarcity of fossil fuels.
Hence, the correct answer is an Option(3) i.e. Since waste can be managed tactfully, atomic energy is a better option to produce energy by avoiding the aggravation of pollution and consumption of biofuels.