Use app×
Join Bloom Tuition
One on One Online Tuition
JEE MAIN 2025 Foundation Course
NEET 2025 Foundation Course
CLASS 12 FOUNDATION COURSE
CLASS 10 FOUNDATION COURSE
CLASS 9 FOUNDATION COURSE
CLASS 8 FOUNDATION COURSE
0 votes
974 views
in Reasoning by (237k points)
closed by
Hetvabhasa (fallacy) produced in the conclusion due to refutation of Sadhya by Hetu is known as:
1. Asiddha
2. Savyabhicara
3. Viruddha
4. Satpratipaksha

1 Answer

0 votes
by (239k points)
selected by
 
Best answer
Correct Answer - Option 3 : Viruddha

The correct solution is "Viruddha"

 A fallacy in Indian logic is known as Hetvabhasa. This fallacy means, the middle term appears to be a reason but is not a valid reason. In western logic, fallacies are formal in nature.
These are the following fallacies in Indian logic:
  • Savyabhicara or the fallacy of irregular middle: a middle term may be irregularly related to the major term. When the middle is not uniformly related to the major term then that is called savyabhicara hetu.
    • example: all bipeds are rational.
    • swans are bipeds.
    • therefore, swans are rational.
  • Viruddha or the contradictory middle: The viruddha hetu or the contradictory middle is that hetu, which though offered to establish the existence of the sadhya actually establishes the non-existence of the sadhya.
    • example: sound is eternal because it is produced.
  • Satpratipaka or the inferentially contradicted middle: when a hetu which is advanced to establish a particular sadhya in inference is validly contradicted by another hetu which proves the non-existence of the sadhya of the first inference, the fallacy of satpratipaka arises.
    • example: sound is eternal because it is audible.
  • Asiddha or the unproved middle: The asiddha hetu is one which is not yet proved, but requires to be proved, like the sadhya. This means that the asiddha hetu is not a proved or an established fact, but an asiddha or unproved assumption.
    • Example: sky lotus is fragnant, because it has lotuses in it like a natural lotus.
  • Badhita hetu or the non-inferentially contradicted middle: The middle term of inference may be contradicted by some other stronger means of knowing such as perception, testimony, etc.
    • Example: "fire is cold because it is a substance".

Hence the answer to the above question is "Viruddha" or contradictory middle which happens when a middle term exists, not in the objects in which a major exists, but in those in which major does not exist. That is, Viruddha or the contradictory middle is that which is pervaded by the absence of the major term.

Welcome to Sarthaks eConnect: A unique platform where students can interact with teachers/experts/students to get solutions to their queries. Students (upto class 10+2) preparing for All Government Exams, CBSE Board Exam, ICSE Board Exam, State Board Exam, JEE (Mains+Advance) and NEET can ask questions from any subject and get quick answers by subject teachers/ experts/mentors/students.

Categories

...