# Statements: All tigers are lions. No cow is lion. Some camels are cows.

110 views
in Aptitude

Statements: All tigers are lions. No cow is lion. Some camels are cows.

Conclusions:

I. Some lions are camels.

II. No camel- is tiger.

III. Some tigers are cows.

a) None follows

b) Only I follows

c) Only II follows

d) Only III follows

e) Either I or II follows

+1 vote
by (59.2k points)
selected by

Correct option: a) None follows

Reason: All tigers are lions. No cow is lion. Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative (E-type) and shouldn't contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No tiger is cow'. Some camels are cows. No cow is lion. Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative (O-type) and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some camels are not lions'. Some camels are cows. No tiger is cow. Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative (O-type) and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some camels are not tigers'.