(i) In ∆AMC and ∆BMD
DM = CM (given)
∠3 = ∠4
(vertically opposite angles)
AM = MB
(as M is the mid-point of AB)
=> ∆AMC ≅ ∆BMD
(by SAS congruency rule)
(ii) ∵ ∆AMC ≅ ∆BMD
=> ∠1 = ∠2 (by c.p.c.t)
But they are alternate angles,
so AC || BD
=> ∠ACB + ∠DBC = 180
(sum of the interior angles on the same side of a transversal is equal to 180°)
But ∠ACB = 90° (given)
=> ∠DBC = 180° = 90°
(iii) In ∆DBC and ∆ACB
∵ ∠DBC = ∠ACB = 90°
BC = BC (common side)
BD = CA
(∵ ∆AMC ≅ ∆BMD)
∴ ∆DBC ≅ ∆ACB
(by SAS congruency rule)
(iv) ∵ ∆DBC ≅ ∆ACB
=> DC = AB
But M mid-point of DC
=> 2CM = CD
=> 2CM = AB [∵ DC = AB]
=> CM = 1/2 AB.
Hence proved.