Under British rule in India, the land settlement systems were crucial mechanisms through which the British administration sought to establish control over land revenue collection and administration. These systems varied across different regions and periods but generally fell into three main categories:
-
Permanent Settlement (Zamindari System):
- Introduction: Introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal, Bihar, and parts of Orissa.
- Features: Land was permanently settled with zamindars (landlords) who were recognized as the owners of land. They were required to collect revenue from peasants (ryots) and pay a fixed amount to the British government.
- Impact: Led to the creation of a landlord class with hereditary rights over land. Zamindars often exploited the peasants, leading to widespread rural indebtedness and poverty.
-
Mahalwari System:
- Introduction: Implemented initially by Holt Mackenzie in the early 19th century, primarily in North-Western Provinces (modern Uttar Pradesh), Punjab, and parts of Central India.
- Features: Revenue assessment was made at the village or mahal level. Revenue was assessed based on the productivity of the land, and it was typically collected from village headmen or prominent landowners.
- Impact: Led to the consolidation of landholdings in the hands of a few wealthy individuals, similar to the zamindari system. It, however, avoided the creation of a landlord class as powerful as under the Permanent Settlement.
-
Ryotwari System:
- Introduction: Implemented in parts of Madras Presidency (modern Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh), Bombay Presidency (modern Maharashtra, Gujarat), and parts of Central India.
- Features: Land revenue was assessed and collected directly from individual peasant cultivators (ryots). Each ryot held a direct relationship with the British administration.
- Impact: Generally led to lesser intermediary exploitation compared to zamindari and mahalwari systems. However, it also exposed peasants directly to the demands and fluctuations of the revenue administration.
Implications of the Land Settlement Systems:
- Economic Impact: The systems aimed to ensure a stable revenue source for the British East India Company and later the British Crown. However, they often led to economic hardships for peasants, contributing to agrarian distress.
- Social Impact: Created and perpetuated hierarchies in rural society, with zamindars or large landowners enjoying privileges and powers at the expense of peasant communities.
- Political Impact: Fueled discontent and resistance among peasants and local rulers, contributing to various uprisings and movements against British rule, such as the Indigo Revolt and the Deccan Riots.
In summary, while the land settlement systems introduced by the British aimed to streamline revenue collection and administration, they had significant negative social and economic consequences for the Indian peasantry and contributed to the broader discontent that eventually fueled the Indian independence movement.
